Effective Solutions for the Texas Criminal Justice System

May 10, 2005 Fort Worth Star-Telegram "Report faults lawyers, judges in fake drug cases"

Home | Solutions | F.A.Q.s | At the Legislature | In the News | Library | Events

Report faults lawyers, judges in fake drug cases

By Bill Miller
Star-Telegram Dallas Bureau
 
DALLAS - Lawyers and judges should share some of the blame for the 2001 "fake drugs" scandal in which authorities wrongfully jailed dozens of innocent people, according to a report released Monday by special prosecutors.
 
The 64-page document, presented by Deputy Special Prosecutor Jack Zimmermann of Houston, states that although prosecutors, defense attorneys and municipal court judges committed no criminal acts in the drug cases, they did exercise numerous instances of bad judgment that allowed the scandal to evolve.
 
"This is an assignment in which I don't expect to have any friends in Dallas when I leave," Zimmermann said during a news conference. "Someone is going to be displeased, or worse."
 
The report is the result of a vow made by Special Prosecutor Dan Hagood when he accepted appointment to the case in December 2003. He told the media then that he would not only investigate police officers, but also lawyers and judges. He subsequently enlisted Zimmermann, a criminal defense lawyer from Houston, with whom he had served in the Marine Corps.
 
"Clearly, something went wrong and something needs to be done," Zimmerman said.
 
For example, the report cites insufficient communication as the worst problem among prosecutors handling the cases. He said they should have told each other about the bogus evidence turning up in their individual cases involving former police narcotics officer Mark De La Paz, but they didn't, which allowed people to stay behind bars longer.
 
"My problem is ... why did it take so long to connect the dots?" Zimmermann said.
 
Improved communication is one of several recommendations Zimmermann urged in his report. District Attorney Bill Hill, after reviewing the report, noted that authorities have already implemented many of the recommendations.
 
He also defended prosecutors, saying they operated "at a distinct disadvantage because they were lied to and misled by the very officers they depended on to be men of integrity."
 
"This office," he added, "has done everything in its power to ensure that these terrible miscarriages of justice never again occur in Dallas County, and we will not stop until all those responsible are fully and finally brought to justice."
 
Zimmermann said some defense attorneys vigorously defended their clients, while others too quickly suggested plea agreements. In those cases, he said, defense lawyers "should strongly encourage the use of the no-contest plea" to keep innocent clients from committing perjury by wrongly acknowledging guilt.
 
The report also urges municipal judges to more thoroughly scrutinize arrest warrant affidavits before signing them.
 
Administrative Municipal Judge Jay Robinson said the report is well-written and that he is eager to share its findings with the city's 25 magistrates. He also said, however, that few steps will matter if a police officer doesn't exhibit integrity.
 
"I don't know of any judge that doesn't believe a police officer's word is his bond," Robinson said.